[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:42:28 -0400 |
Hello,
>> After looking at it more, there aren't really enough stack functions
>> to warrant a test suite.
>
> Sounds like a fallacious argument to me. ;-)
>
> Would it be possible for you to add test cases? There are a few tests
> under “stacks” in eval.test; perhaps something along these lines would
> work?
Yes, you're right. Those tests showed me how to get a stack. I pushed
the fix with two new test cases, and then cleaned up the stack-test
code a bit.
Thanks a lot,
Noah
- Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Noah Lavine, 2012/04/18
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Noah Lavine, 2012/04/18
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/18
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Noah Lavine, 2012/04/18
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/18
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Noah Lavine, 2012/04/18
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Noah Lavine, 2012/04/19
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/20
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/22
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution,
Noah Lavine <=
- Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/24