[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Growable arrays?
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Growable arrays? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:36:28 +0200 |
On 9 Jun 2012, at 14:32, David Kastrup wrote:
> Scheme/Guile vectors are fixed size. Now I have a situation where I
> have a basic type lattice with records stored in vectors, and this type
> lattice may be extended dynamically (which typically happens at the
> start of a whole file, for potentially multi-file runs). Scheme does
> not offer a suitable data structure for that.
If only grows at one end, something like C++ std::deque might be suitable. It
has the advantage of not having to invoke copy constructors when it grows.
Hans
- Re: Growable arrays?, (continued)
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, Daniel Hartwig, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, Andy Wingo, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, Daniel Hartwig, 2012/06/11
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/11
Re: Growable arrays?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/11
Re: Growable arrays?,
Hans Aberg <=
Re: Growable arrays?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/06/14
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/14
- Re: Growable arrays?, Daniel Hartwig, 2012/06/14
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/14
- Re: Growable arrays?, Daniel Hartwig, 2012/06/14
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/14
- Re: Growable arrays?, Daniel Hartwig, 2012/06/14
- Re: Growable arrays?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/14