[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:43:31 -0400 |
Hello,
> Did you consider starting from GNU/MIT Scheme? It supports only IA32
> and x86_64, I think, but it’s in Scheme, and it’s GNU.
Actually, that's an interesting thought in general. I looked at MIT
scheme a bit a long time ago, but I believe it uses two intermediate
languages, a high-level one similar to Tree-IL and a low-level one
that I don't know much about. We might be able to turn Tree-IL into
the high-level one and use their compiler infrastructure. Since
they're a GNU project, there might not be copyright issues.
However, I'm not sure if this has advantages over just building it
ourselves. And I don't know if the MIT Scheme developers would like
this or not.
Noah
- patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/15
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/17
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions,
Noah Lavine <=
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Noah Lavine, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Daniel Krueger, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Daniel Krueger, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/21