[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile Lua
Re: Guile Lua
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:50:49 +0800
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 22:07 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> nalaginrut <address@hidden> skribis:
> > I'd like to know what work should the maintainer take? As I know there's
> > some work has been done, but it didn't merge into stable-2.0. What's the
> > rest work? Does it work now?
> I think the first task for you (congratulations! ;-)) or anyone else
> interested will be to check out the branch, build it, assess it, and
> tell us what it’s current status is.
> Then, assuming it’s in a good shape, one would have to try running
> actual Lua programs, in search of bugs. Along the way, these bugs would
> have to be fixed, and the test suite augmented accordingly.
> Then the fine points regarding multi-language integration will have to
> be sorted out. The manual will have to be updated.
> When all this is in place, we can consider merging the branch. I
> wouldn’t want to merge a half-baked front-end.
@ijp: thanks for the info ;-)
@ludo: Thanks! I'll try to do it follow your steps.
Besides, do we have the final conclusion for the multi-lang choosing
approach, say, --lang=lua/elisp or #lang lua or a script:
guile-lua/guile-elisp... whatever. IIRC, ijp raised such a topic, but it
seems no conclusion.
I ask this because there should be an easy way to test some big code
segment written in other language.
Re: Guile Lua, Ian Price, 2012/11/19
- Guile Lua, Ian Price, 2012/11/17
- Re: Guile Lua, nalaginrut, 2012/11/18
- Re: Guile Lua, nalaginrut, 2012/11/20
- Re: Guile Lua, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/11/21
- Re: Guile Lua, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/11/21
- Re: Guile Lua, nalaginrut, 2012/11/22