[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: syntax closures

From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Subject: Re: syntax closures
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:06:27 +0100

Hi wingo:

Yes this is something I can do. But on a second thought I can't find a way to
handle unsyntax-splicing without a splicing macro. Modding #, and not #,@
just screams for difficult errors to show up. Therefor I will in stead
just write
another macro unsyntax-72 that people can use.

btw, I tried to get gnus working but cannot send mail from it :-(


On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue 22 Jan 2013 17:19, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> writes:
>>> > (read-hash-extend #\_ syntax-closure-reader)
>>> Have you tried having your srfi-72 module export a binding for unsyntax?
>> I would like to use that of cause, but does it mix well with other
>> already written code?
> It should work in a modular fashion.  #,foo reads as (unsyntax foo), and
> the meaning of that depends on the binding of unsyntax that is current.
> Andy
> --

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]