Re: Programming racket like in guile

[Daniel Hartwig]

On 22 February 2013 04:59,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> I also suggest that for people writing compatability code that we have
> a standard namespace for this. Let me suggest
>
> (compat name-of-scheme/lisp component ...)
> e.g.
> (compat racket match)
> (compat racket for)
> (compat racket struct)
>
> The idea is that we push code here that is useful for porting
> the components that we are actually interesting to have in guile
>  like syntax-parse.

For those parts specific to racket, did you consider the (language
racket ..) namespace, where an eventual language definition could be
placed also?