guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Road to 2.2


From: Nala Ginrut
Subject: Re: The Road to 2.2
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:06 +0800

On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 00:23 -0400, Noah Lavine wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
> >
> > > On Sat 18 May 2013 15:44, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > >> I have a very small question, based on something I think you said
> > >> earlier - since the container will be ELF, will we call our files .so
> > >> now?
> > >
> > > We certainly can.  Is it a good idea though?
> >
> > I’d vote for keeping .go, or at least something different from
> > commonly-used extensions like .so.
> >
> 
> I don't think it's a big deal, but the reason I asked was that I'm afraid
> .go will become increasingly popular because of the Go language. .so also
> sort of hints at native compilation in the future, although that's not a
> very strong reason to choose it.
> 

How about .glc or .glo?
But anyway, I don't think we should yield against a competitor.

> Noah





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]