[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:38:02 -0800
I realize the _i_ will have to be replaced, and the name
scm_c_with_continuation_barrier is already taken, however,
I found in writing gdb/guile/scm-safe-call.c that
scm_i_with_continuation_barrier is exactly what I need. Since it's
not available I had to do two levels of calls where one should
Here's what I'd like:
Since I don't have that I have to do something more complicated.
I'm currently experimenting with
scm_with_guile -> scm_c_with_continuation_barrier -> scm_c_catch.
[what's currently checked into the gdb tree is a work in progress.
blech - I thought I had resolved this but I can see I'm lacking any
The current scm_c_with_continuation_barrier is nasty because it uses
continuations.c:pre_unwind_handler which will print the exception ...
but I don't want Guile to print the exception - I want to control
if/when it's printed. I also don't want continuations.c:c_handler - I
don't want a throw of 'quit to terminate gdb.
What I want is all the functionality of scm_c_catch and all the
functionality of scm_c_with_continuation_barrier ... which is exactly
what scm_i_with_continuation_barrier is.
So ... any chance in exporting scm_i_with_continuation_barrier?
[renamed of course :-)]
How about scm_c_catch_with_continuation_barrier?
- Export scm_i_with_continuation_barrier?,
Doug Evans <=