|From:||Panicz Maciej Godek|
|Subject:||Re: Guile Assembler|
|Date:||Tue, 23 Jun 2015 23:33:06 +0200|
> > Hm. Where's the difference to Guile's define? And why do you have double
> > parentheses in your example?
> > Still a bit lost.
> hmm...do you read the pasted code in the repo? ;-)
Not yet, I must admit. But nevermind, got it. It looks like a definition
for a parametric func or for a half-curried func, depending on how you
squint at it ;-)
That explains the second set of parens.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|