[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for feedback on SRFI-126

From: Arne Babenhauserheide
Subject: Re: Request for feedback on SRFI-126
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:20:23 +0200
User-agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 09:58:32 schrieb Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı /Kammer:
> Exactly, I agree.  It should be noted though that some things can be
> implemented purely as portable libraries, so there needn't be a Request
> For Implementations to do it, whereas some other things, which I call
> "fundamental" features, need to be supported by implementations, so they
> need to be in the language specification or an authoritative SRFI.

What is an authoritative SRFI? One which is available in most

Best wishes,
1w6 sie zu achten,
sie alle zu finden,
in Spiele zu leiten
und sacht zu verbinden.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]