|From:||Panicz Maciej Godek|
|Subject:||Re: Wisp as shipped language in Guile?|
|Date:||Sat, 13 May 2017 09:24:56 +0200|
Arne Babenhauserheide <address@hidden> writes:
> A few weeks ago I asked in IRC whether wisp could be included with
> Guile in modules/language/wisp to allow every guile users to run wisp
> code from any Guile installation via
> $ guile --language=wisp [<file>]
> Essentially this is about making wisp as language part of the
> "batteries" of Guile.
About 4.5 years ago, I went out on a limb and added SRFI-105 (curly
infix expressions) to core Guile. Even now, I'm of the opinion that
judicious use of curly infix could be beneficial for readability, but as
far as I can tell, there's been essentially no uptake. If I'm wrong
about that, please let me know.
Although (a subset of) SRFI-105 seems like a clear win to me, I cannot
say the same of either Wisp or SRFI-110 (Sweet expressions).
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|