[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Weak tables harmful to GC? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:11:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>>
>>>> Also, it no longer displays the pathological behavior shown in
>>>> <https://bugs.gnu.org/28590>.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, even better if people could test the two patches and confirm
>>>> that it works for them.
>>>>
>>>> Then if there are no objections I’d like to merge them in ‘stable-2.2’.
>>>
>>> Sounds great indeed, but it didn't apply to master or stable-2.2 for me?
>>
>> Really? The two patches should apply to stable-2.2, though you need to
>> apply them in the right order (I have it applied over
>> 80696023620eae12f9b2f167aee834f632a32739.)
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> Huh? What object is this? I don't see it in my git repo.
My bad, it’s actually ac0d3dcc533850d25f3e533c04c1c238a83f190b.
Ludo’.
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/10/09
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/25
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/25
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/27
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/28
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/30
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/30
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/30