[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators

From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:29:50 -0500

Note that 121 is withdrawn, so people should implement 158.

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 1:38 AM Mark H Weaver <> wrote:
Hi Arthur,

"Arthur A. Gleckler" <> writes:
> It's not a bad idea for the sample implementation to be as clear as
> possible at the expense of performance.

I agree that it's desirable for one of the sample implementations to be
as simple and clear as possible, for the purpose of clarifying the

> But it certainly wouldn't hurt to have a supplemental document making
> recommendations about possible performance improvements, or even a
> second implementation.

Sounds good.  For SRFIs such as 121 and 158, where efficiency is
important, I think that a second sample implementation tuned for
performance would be a useful addition.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]