Re: New g-wrap supported in guile-gtk--rotty-0.1!

[Andreas Rottmann]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> So what you end up with is GF's like `remove-tag', with only one method
> (gtk-tree-buffer-remove-tag in this case), that just serve as
> abbrevations for the underlying functions when you know what kind of
> object you're dealing with. The optimization problem is different: We
> want to make many generic functions with few methods, not the other way
> around.
>
> Perhaps making a specialized `add-method!' delay method addition to a
> specialized `no-method' would be the best option in this case.
>
Hmm, don't seem to get that --verbose please :-)

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.