Re: CVS build fixlet

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Andreas Rottmann writes:

> If you want to do hacking, you should definitly check out the split
> packages, as the guile-gobject branch is a "dead end". See [0] for
> instructions.

Ok, done that now.  How about adding this information into the top of
the README and ChangeLog files of both CVS archives?

However, I can't seem to get g-wrap-2.0.

    checking for g-wrap-2.0-guile... Package g-wrap-2.0-guile was not found in 
the pkg-config search path.
    Perhaps you should add the directory containing `g-wrap-2.0-guile.pc'
    to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
    No package 'g-wrap-2.0-guile' found

Do I really need that?  The README still refers to 1.3.4 and
http://www.gnucash.org/pub/g-wrap/source/ nor
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/g-wrap/
seems to have it?

I tried to pull from address@hidden at
http://people.debian.org/~rlb/arch/g-wrap/.  as described on
http://www.nongnu.org/g-wrap/TheNextGeneration.html,
but I can't seem to guess the name of the 2.0 branch.

> Anyway, the more API we cover, the better. Take a look at how the
> modules are organized, they all follow a common layout.

Will do.

> We welcome any GNOME/GObject-based wrappers, altough wnck shouldn't be
> loaded by (gnome gtk).

Sure [the patch is still in hello-world mode.]  Then I'll just scratch
my itch first and see where we go from there.

Greetings,
Jan.

> [0] http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2004-05/msg00010.html


-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org