guile-gtk-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: g-wrap: guile-CVS build error


From: Andreas Rottmann
Subject: Re: g-wrap: guile-CVS build error
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:00:52 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I noticed fixes for guile-CVS in g-wrap, which is great, but it
> doesn't quite work for me yet.  Am I missing something?
>
> make[4]: Entering directory 
> `/home/janneke/arch/test/g-wrap/=build/guile/g-wrap/gw'
> guile  -c \
>           "(set! %load-path (cons \"../../../guile\" (cons \"../../../..\" 
> %load-path)))""(use-modules (g-wrap)) \
>                 (use-modules (g-wrap guile)) \
>                         (use-modules (g-wrap guile ws standard)) \
>                         (generate-wrapset 'guile 'standard \"standard\")"
> WARNING: (srfi srfi-35): `every' imported from both (oop goops util) and 
> (srfi srfi-1)
> WARNING: (srfi srfi-35): `any' imported from both (oop goops util) and (srfi 
> srfi-1)
> WARNING: (g-wrap util): imported module (srfi srfi-34) overrides core binding 
> `raise'
> WARNING: (g-wrap): imported module (srfi srfi-34) overrides core binding 
> `raise'ERROR: Unbound variable: class-name
> make[4]: *** [standard.c] Fout 2
>
This is with Guile CVS, I guess. Does the build work for you with 1.6?

> Btw, when I had similar problems before building guile-gnome, I found
> myself adding debugging to GUILE build commands, how about always adding
>
>    (debug-enable 'debug)
>    (debug-enable 'backtrace)
>
> to build commands used during build?  That makes finding/fixing errors
> a bit more fun.
>
You can use 

make GUILE_FLAGS="--debug"

A backtrace for the above error would be helpful.

Cheers, Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

I have a truly elegant proof of the  above, but it is too long to
fit into this .signature file.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]