[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: entries and guile-gui
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: entries and guile-gui |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:11:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> It looks like #f now (Gtk+ 2.0) means "carry on calling other handlers
>> for this signal" and non-#f (which includes the unspecified value)
>> means "don't call any other handlers",
>
> Yes, that's the return to give for a gdk event callback. Some events
> might have no further dispatch anyway, so the return may not matter.
Thanks.
>> and I guess this was not the case in the past (Gtk+ 1.2).
>
> There's certainly been changes in the dispatch area (for the gtk 2
> "closures" stuff), but I thought the return from a handler got passed
> up to gtk in both the 1.2 and 2.0 code.
>
> (In the 1.2 code I think it's inner_callback_marshal putting "ans"
> from the scheme call into the args with sgtk_scm2ret.)
There may be some other factor then. I'm going to leave this for now
though; I'll come back to it if the issue/question crops up again.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: entries and guile-gui, (continued)
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/18
- Message not available
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/21
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/24
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/25
- Re: entries and guile-gui,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Kevin Ryde, 2007/02/26
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/28
- Re: entries and guile-gui, Neil Jerram, 2007/02/22