[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in and-map and or-map? What am I doing wrong?

From: Alejandro Forero Cuervo
Subject: Re: Bug in and-map and or-map? What am I doing wrong?
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:34:15 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

    > Hmmm, according to R5RS, `eq?' expects _exactly_ two arguments, and
    > `=' expects two or more arguments ...

    Right, seems to be worth fixing.

While the R5RS does say this, that I regard this as a nice extension of
Guile that I really like.

It allows you to do things like

    (apply equal? list-with-objects) ,

which, in my opinion, are nice.  Otherwise, we would be have to deal
with having to iterate on the lists everywhere.

I think introducing this change would break a lot of code.  At least
it would break a lot of my code (and, from his implementation of
and-map and or-map, I guess Neil Jerram's).



The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution.
      -- Albert Einstein.

$0='!/sfldbi!yjoV0msfQ!sfiupob!utvK'x44;print map{("\e[7m \e[0m",chr ord
"219CC1CCC033E7E660198CCE4E66798303873CCE60F3387$F"#Don't you love Perl?

Attachment: pgpeoQzsqlnFV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]