[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?

From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Subject: Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
Date: 12 May 2001 12:37:58 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> Note that I believe the current primary tactic is for the other
> languages to be translated via a front-end into a low-level scheme
> representation that will then be executed by the interpreter, a VM, a
> JIT compiler, or perhaps .so code generated via C->gcc->so
> conversion.  All of these options are being discussed on guile-devel
> right now, and we may end up with a hybrid in the end.

I think that's a poor version.  We should translate the other
languages into Scheme.  The ease of doing this is precisely why Scheme
was chosen.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]