[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:48:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:45:59PM +0200, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> From: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:34:45 +0200
>
> Uh, oh. What I'd like to see would be a `standard' regexp
> interface for Scheme (and may be a `standard' regexp
> implementation for Guile).
>
> supposedly scheme is more general than everything else so any
> (language) interface can be expressed in scheme. by twisted
> scotch-addled analogy i posit there exists some super general
> regular expression engine upon which any (regexp engine)
> interface can be built. maybe that would be librx, maybe not.
Hm. All our sins come back to haunt us ;-)
I had a more humble target: just have an interface (for which
we'd have to decide, among lots of other things, whether this
interface forbids higher levels in the Chomsky hierarchy and
enforces `true' regexps, as seems to be Tom's approach --and
he knows a lot about regexps--) or not).
Cheers
-- tomas
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/26
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Dale P. Smith, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, rm, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Marlow, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Harri Haataja, 2003/10/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord <address@hidden> To, 2003/10/27