[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash
|
From: |
Paul Jarc |
|
Subject: |
Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:58:31 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Roland Orre <address@hidden> wrote:
> No you are right, but it felt better just to avoid numerical overflow,
> but... I don't remember if that's an issue for integers.
Calculations with unsigned long and unsigned int are automatically
done modulo *_MAX+1; overflow is guaranteed to produce wraparound.
paul