[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary
From: |
Thamer Al-Harbash |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary |
Date: |
Sun, 2 May 2004 13:52:26 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Mike Gran wrote:
> Where's the best place for the Guile script? Best, in this case, means
> most foolproof for the the desktop user that is going to download the
> program as a pre-compiled package. Dot file? In the library? Is
> there a "right" way or a "standard"?
I'd drop them in /usr/local/share/program-name/foo.scm, but I'm
just following unix convention and I use the auto-tools to make
this user configurable. If your user is going to keep them in
their homedirectori then usually you can create a .prognamerc and
a direcotry .progname for files.
Can you distribute a program linked to guile in binary only? I
just checked guile-1.6.x is under the GPL and not LGPL so I don't
see how this is possible, unless you're meeting some of the other
requirements of the GPL.
--
Thamer Al-Harbash
GPG Key fingerprint: D7F3 1E3B F329 8DD5 FAE3 03B1 A663 E359 D686 AA1F
- Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Mike Gran, 2004/05/02
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary,
Thamer Al-Harbash <=
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Mike Gran, 2004/05/02
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Linas Vepstas, 2004/05/03
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Mike Gran, 2004/05/03
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Rob Browning, 2004/05/14
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/15
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Rob Browning, 2004/05/15
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/17
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/24
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Linas Vepstas, 2004/05/03
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Paul Emsley, 2004/05/04