[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1+ is not R5RS
From: |
Clinton Ebadi |
Subject: |
Re: 1+ is not R5RS |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:31:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" <address@hidden> writes:
>> Could you provide me some background why 1+ exists, as it is the same
>> as (+ 1, and why is it named like this?
>
> It'll be hard to get a definite answer: these procedures have "always"
> been there, at least since Jim Blandy became Guile's maintainer:
>
> commit 0f2d19dd46f83f41177f61d585732b32a866d613
> Author: Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu Jul 25 22:56:11 1996 +0000
>
> That's a long time ago...
Probably because Common Lisp has 1+ and 1-.
--
Lindsay (Carlton): nighttime baker! sounds a little iffy