Re: loading a module

[Tomas By]

On Sun, February 28, 2010 23:59, Neil Jerram wrote:
> This is really a stab in the dark - but could you try using a name for
> the Scheme-level procedure that is different from the module name?
> Currently they are both "mytest".
>
> I think there could be some residual nonsense meaning for a binding that
> has the same name as the module...

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried changing the name in the "define_gsubr"
and "export" statements and it made no difference.

But it's ok. Compiling my own binary is fine for what I am doing. I'm not
sure why I bother so much about this in the first place. Maybe I should
have my head looked at.

/Tomas