[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clis
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:12:43 +0800 |
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Mattes wrote:
> Isn't the main problem here that the OP assumes that all three languages
> have "the same syntax"? This isn't true at all. They share some basic
> syntax but any "real" CL/Elisp/Scheme code will use more than this basic
> subset. And even within this limited syntactic subset, while one syntax
> will work the same syntactic consgruct will have different _semantics_.
>
> Cheers, Ralf Mattes
>
Yes, I'm afraid you're right, so I said pre-process is more portable.
Anyway, the project based on such an assumption will be very fragile.
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, (continued)
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/30
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Alexei Matveev, 2013/07/31