[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: System Scheme (was Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: System Scheme (was Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support) |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:27:52 +0300 |
>>> From: Marko Rauhamaa <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:08:23 +0300
>>> Cc: address@hidden
>>>
>>> Michael Tiedtke <address@hidden>:
>>>> POSIX isn't that important or useful anymore but "full access to
>>>> POSIX system calls" it has never been.
>>> What I'd like is a way to communicate open file descriptors between
>>> processes.
>> That's highly non-portable, and is bound to produce Guile code that
>> works only on some systems.
> I'd like to produce Guile code that works on Linux. As it stands, I
> can't.
Of course you can: write it in C and load it via FFI.
- GOOPS Terminal Class, Michael Tiedtke, 2015/06/18
- Re: GOOPS Terminal Class, Michael Tiedtke, 2015/06/18
- Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support, Michael Tiedtke, 2015/06/23
- Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support, Marko Rauhamaa, 2015/06/23
- Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/23
- Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support, Marko Rauhamaa, 2015/06/23
- System Scheme (was Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support), Michael Tiedtke, 2015/06/23
- Re: System Scheme (was Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: System Scheme (was Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support), Marko Rauhamaa, 2015/06/24
- Re: System Scheme (was Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support), Ludovic Courtès, 2015/06/25
- Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support, Mike Gran, 2015/06/23
- Re: GOOPS Terminal Class - RnRS POSIX support, Michael Tiedtke, 2015/06/23
Viper C0 alfa, Michael Tiedtke, 2015/06/28