[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful
From: |
Marko Rauhamaa |
Subject: |
Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:31:37 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Freja Nordsiek <address@hidden>:
> I checked the implementation of bytecectors and SRFI-4 in Guile and
> they are definitely not scanned for pointers. But I would say hacking
> them is not a good general solution for this problem. They are good
> and natural data structures for large arrays of numerical data that
> are standard signed/unsigned integers of various fixed sizes and IEEE
> floating point numbers, or structures/unions of these types. Using
> them for things other than that or strings/byte-arrays could be error
> prone, messy, and performance poor.
So no Scheme solution recommended then?
Marko
Guile bugs, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Mark H Weaver, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/21