[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A value for "nothing"
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: A value for "nothing" |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:32:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
John Cowan <address@hidden> writes:
> However, in formats like JSON where map keys are always strings,
> it can save a lot of space to represent them as symbols, since
> they are often repeated from one object to the next. There is no such
> limitation in MessagePack, although I bet strings are the most common
> type of map keys.
Agree that this is a point in favor of using symbols to represent
MessagePack strings.
Mark
- A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/08/26
- Re: A value for "nothing", Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/26
- Re: A value for "nothing", Matt Wette, 2018/08/26
- Re: A value for "nothing", tomas, 2018/08/27
- Re: A value for "nothing", Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/27
- Re: A value for "nothing", Hans Ã…berg, 2018/08/27
- Re: A value for "nothing", Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/27
- Re: A value for "nothing", Matt Wette, 2018/08/27
- Re: A value for "nothing", Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/28
- Re: A value for "nothing", John Cowan, 2018/08/28
- Re: A value for "nothing", Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/28