Re: [ANN] Guile Hall 0.3.0 released

[Alex Sassmannshausen]

Hey Catonano,

Sorry it took a bit longer for me to get around to it.

I liked the style of your text.  I've taken the liberty to expand on it
some more — but I'm happy to go with your version if you / the
maintainers prefer.

Also, I changed references from guile-hall to Hall.  Whilst the name of
the folder etc is guile-hall, the project itself is called Hall, or
Guile Hall to make it part of the Guile family :-)

I would love for this section to be added to the Guile manual.

Wdyt?

0001-Added-a-reference-to-Guile-Hall-in-the-manual.patch
Description: Text Data

Alex

Catonano <address@hidden> writes:

> Il giorno gio 21 mag 2020 alle ore 12:03 Alex Sassmannshausen 
> <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>
>  Heya,
>
>  On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 12:00 +0200, Catonano wrote:
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Il giorno mer 20 mag 2020 alle ore 17:58 Catonano <address@hidden
>  > > ha scritto:
>  > > 
>  > > Ok this is the last revision for today
>  > > Now I'm gonna do something else, really ! 😀
>  > > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > So, today is another day and I have a new update
>  > 
>  > I'm watching this talk
>  > https://peertube.social/videos/watch/8f27a614-aa63-4811-af6a-b9e11effc399
>  > 
>  > and it made up my mind that in this patch I'm intermingling reference
>  > type content and tutorial type content
>  > 
>  > Guile desperately lacks some good tutorial and how to materials
>  > 
>  > Because, as the person on the video says, programmers tend to assume
>  > that what people want is information
>  > 
>  > But the solution is not to spray the reference manual with bit of
>  > tutorials here and there
>  > 
>  > Because, according to the person talking, that decreases the quality
>  > of both reference and tutorials
>  > 
>  > Today I'm a bit busy but I'll submit a proper patch maybe tomorrow
>
>  I think these are very good points.  I think that's where the
>  difference between the Guix Manual and the Cookbook come from.
>
>  The Guile manual is definitely a reference manual! :-)
>
>  I'll await your update tomorrow.
>
>  Alex
>
> here we go