[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome l
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
Subject: |
Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:18:23 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de> wrote:
> On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de> writes:
>>>> First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free
>>>> documentation. FWIW, most of ‘awesome lists’ are under CC0.
>>> While the list is not CC0, I meant to put it under "GNU Free Documentation
>>> License v1.3", which I think should be appropriate (Is it not?) and free as
>>> in freedom. Good that you hint at the license, because I thought it had a
>>> license already.
>> GFDL isn’t considered as free by the debian standards, because it can have
>> invariant sections. CC by-sa might be a good fit, since it is compatible
>> with GPLv3 and wikipedia at the same time.
>
> I just read multiple articles about GFDL and CC0 and still don't know what
> the better choice is for the list.
Sometimes itʼs better to read a text itself than multiple texts about text. ;-)
As least FSF have always tried to keep their licences in English, not legalese.
Doing it, you would find out right away, than GNU FDL is a licence for
“manuals, textbooks, or other functional and useful documents”; and most of it
is about things like ‘Front Cover’, ‘Back Cover’, ‘Title Page’, ‘Dedications’,
‘Endorsements’, etc, and what one have to do when printing 101+ copies.
What is not written in it, though, is the fact itʼs _not_ compatible with any
version of GNU GPL.
> In particular I do not find information about whether CC0 is copyleft or not
> (1)
Quoth <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0> (emphasis mine):
| A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest
extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason, CC0 also
provides a *lax, permissive* license as a fallback. Both public domain works
and the lax license provided by CC0 are compatible with the GNU GPL.
|
| If you want to release your non-software work to the public domain, we
recommend you use CC0.
Besides being GPL-compatible, itʼs FDL-compatible as well, while CC BY-SA is
not.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list, (continued)
- Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué, 2020/07/13
- Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2020/07/14
- Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/07/15
- Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2020/07/15
- Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/07/15
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list),
Dmitry Alexandrov <=
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list), Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/07/16
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list), Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/07/16
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list), Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2020/07/16
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list), Vladimir Zhbanov, 2020/07/16
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list), Vladimir Zhbanov, 2020/07/16
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list), John Cowan, 2020/07/16
- Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list), Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/07/17
Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/07/14