[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sbcl package definition
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: sbcl package definition |
|
Date: |
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 22:42:34 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Cyril Roelandt <address@hidden> skribis:
> On 10/06/2013 09:28 PM, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
>> On 10/06/2013 07:23 AM, Kete wrote:
>>> Instead of ./configure, make and make install, sbcl uses a command like
>>> this: INSTALL_ROOT=/home/me sh install.sh
>>>
>>> How would the build-system and inputs go?
>>>
>>
>> I think you should use the trivial build system, and define a builder in
>> the arguments:
>>
>
> Forget it and see Ludovic's answer :)
In short ‘trivial-build-system’ is really too trivial: it doesn’t have
the notion of phases, doesn’t unpack the source tarball, etc.
Ludo’.