Re: Preliminary 'wip-armhf' branch pushed

[Mark H Weaver]

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:

> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I've pushed a new branch 'wip-armhf' (not to be confused with 'wip-arm')
>> which seems likely to finish natively building bootstrap tarballs soon.
>> It is based on the 'core-updates' branch.
>
> I believe that my cross-compiled bootstrap tarballs are bad and have to
> be rebuilt.  Despite passing both --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf and
> --with-float=hard to GCC's configure, I believe that GCC was using the
> soft-float ABI for ARM by default.

False alarm.  Looking at the source code of gcc/config/arm/linux-eabi.h
and seeing a patch in Debian made me think that we needed a patch in
order to make this work, but testing indicates that the hard-float ABI
is being used by GCC by default without any patches.

So, nevermind :)

      Mark