guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: kde: Add kdelibs.


From: 宋文武
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: kde: Add kdelibs.
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 15:20:45 +0800
User-agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>>   RUNPATH              
>> /gnu/store/7c30kyzagk84inhnb2nbxcmnh76xgh6c-ktouch-4.14.2/lib:/gnu/store/4k20pkxgvfc22wpcvh6xr26ma4b619ad-glibc-2.20/lib:/gnu/store/k7w7wdpvaqlkwq0ijz9149pqn3lq8a5n-gcc-4.8.3-lib/lib64:/gnu/store/k7w7wdpvaqlkwq0ijz9149pqn3lq8a5n-gcc-4.8.3-lib/lib:/gnu/store/k7w7wdpvaqlkwq0ijz9149pqn3lq8a5n-gcc-4.8.3-lib/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.3/../../..
>>
>> (Thanks to Ludovic for the suggestion to use objdump!)
>>
>> The linker line looks like this:
>> Linking CXX executable ktouch
>> cd /tmp/nix-build-ktouch-4.14.2.drv-0/build/src && 
>> /gnu/store/sr9lv3vhviy151zv315zdgi2rvq97a9r-cmake-2.8.12/bin/cmake -E 
>> cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/ktouch.dir/link.txt --verbose=1
>> /gnu/store/13ahaqlmniysmbls5d1fcmzy59yd5xk5-gcc-4.8.3/bin/c++ 
>
> [...]
>
>> -o ktouch -rdynamic 
>> /gnu/store/mipmjv4mpsf3rrsk1mbhpqzlw939v6ny-kdelibs-4.14.2/lib/libkdeclarative.so.5.14.2
>>  
>> /gnu/store/mipmjv4mpsf3rrsk1mbhpqzlw939v6ny-kdelibs-4.14.2/lib/libplasma.so.3.0.0
>>  
>
> [...]
>
>> You see lots of "...so" and no "-l...", which is apparently the cmake way of
>> doing things.
>
> Our ld-wrapper is ineffective when the .so file names are passed
> directly like this.  That is, ld-wrapper adds -rpath for any -l switch,
> but it does not add -rpath for libraries whose absolute file name is
> specified.
>
> That could be easily fixed, but in core-updates.
>
>> But no "-Wl,-rpath" despite
>>    -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH_USE_LINK_PATH=TRUE
>> Does this mean that this option only honours paths coming from "-l", while
>> at the same time using "-l" is unusual with cmake?
>
> Uh.  While we can improve ld-wrapper, the best would of course be to get
> CMake to do the right thing...
We have not change ld-wrapper for this right?

And I have add a note to cmake's tracker:
  http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14974
>
> Thanks for investigating,
> Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]