[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'sudoers' vs. 'hosts-file'
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
Re: 'sudoers' vs. 'hosts-file' |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:17:28 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Pimentel (2015-06-15 01:52 +0300) wrote:
> On 2015-06-14 09:47, Alex Kost wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
>> fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
>> them? So it could be either:
>>
>> 'sudoers-file' and 'hosts-file'
>>
>> or
>>
>> 'sudoers' and 'hosts'
>>
>> (I prefer the latter variant)
>
> Host file is trust relationship (for example host, IP). The sudoers is
> user/group that can use binary command as root (for example ifconfig, dd
> and other).
I didn't meant that those files are the same, I wanted to say that
'sudoers' and 'hosts-file' fields of 'operating-system' record should be
named in the same manner as they are both file-like objects. Sorry for
the confusion.
--
Alex