[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
R dependencies
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
R dependencies |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:09:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
> An alternative is to inherit from the “r” package in “statistics.scm”.
>
> (define-module (my own packages)
> #:use-module (guix packages)
> #:use-module (gnu packages statistics)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-1))
>
> (define-public my-r
> (package (inherit r)
> (name "my-r")
> ;; modify only the inputs here
> (native-inputs (alist-delete "texlive" (package-native-inputs r)))
>
> (inputs (alist-delete "icedtea6" (package-inputs r)))))
Speaking of which: should we get rid of icedtea6:jdk in the default R
package (closure size: 1 GiB), and maybe of TeX Live (4 GiB)? Or should
we provide, say, ‘r-light’ with the definition above?
I’m afraid having these two dependencies by default makes it
prohibitively expensive.
Ludo’.
- Re: Installing a custom package on Guix binary setup, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/09/01
- R dependencies,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Alex Kost, 2015/09/02
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/09/02
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/02
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Alex Kost, 2015/09/03
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/03
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Alex Kost, 2015/09/04
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/05
Re: R dependencies, Vicente Vera, 2015/09/02