[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2 |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:35:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:17:38PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> thanks for the patch!
>
> > From 6dee84494a522921baacbcad8c7618c9eb709eb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Florian Paul Schmidt <address@hidden>
> > Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:30:14 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] swh-plugins-lv2: New variable
>
> The commit message should be:
>
> gnu: Add swh-plugins-lv2.
>
> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (swh-plugins-lv2): New variable.
>
> > ---
> > gnu/packages/audio.scm | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/audio.scm b/gnu/packages/audio.scm
> > index db3f912..ec91c33 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/audio.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/audio.scm
> > @@ -1891,3 +1891,43 @@ access to ALSA PCM devices, taking care of the many
> > functions required to
> > open, initialise and use a hw: device in mmap mode, and providing floating
> > point audio data.")
> > (license license:gpl3+)))
> > +
> > +(define-public swh-plugins-lv2
> > + (let ((commit "5098e09e255eaed14e0d40ca5e7e6dfcb782d7ea"))
>
> We usually don’t use full commit hashes. You could probably trim it to
> the first six characters or so.
Why is that?
>
> It would also be nice to state in a comment why you used this commit
> (e.g. because that’s the latest commit as of now, and there haven’t been
> any releases).
>
> > + (package
> > + (name "swh-plugins-lv2")
> > + (version (string-append "2015-11-11-" commit))
> > + (source (origin
> > + (method url-fetch)
> > + (uri (string-append "https://github.com/swh/"
> > + "lv2/archive/"
> > + commit ".zip"))
>
> There is no good reason to use “.zip” here. “.tar.gz” will work just
> fine and you won’t need the “unzip” input then.
>
> > + (sha256
> > + (base32
> > + "11c6y4nfw5kz7647axpgdaryiiwwrplnkdbkglx362cbcmhpvds8"))))
> > + (build-system gnu-build-system)
> > + (arguments
> > + `(#:phases
> > + (alist-cons-after
>
> Please use ‘modify-phases’ instead of the ‘alist-*’ stuff.
>
> > + 'unpack 'patch-makefile-and-enter-directory
> > + (lambda
> > + _
>
> This should not be on its own line.
>
> > + (substitute* "Makefile"
> > + (("/usr/local") (assoc-ref %outputs "out"))
>
> I don’t think this is really necessary. You could just add a definition
> for “PREFIX” to the make-flags.
>
> > + (("install:") "install: install-system")))
>
>
> > + (alist-delete
> > + 'check
>
> Use “#:tests? #f” instead with a note why tests are disabled.
>
> > + (alist-delete
> > + 'configure
>
> Also here please add a note why.
>
> > + %standard-phases)))
> > + #:make-flags '("CC=gcc")))
> > + (inputs
> > + `(("lv2" ,lv2)
> > + ("unzip" ,unzip)
>
> You don’t need “unzip” (see above), but had you actually needed it you
> should have added it to “native-inputs”.
>
> > + ("fftw" ,fftw)
> > + ("libxslt" ,libxslt)))
> > + (home-page "http://plugin.org.uk")
> > + (synopsis "SWH Plugins in LV2 format")
> > + (description
> > + "A collection of Steve Harris' audio plugins in LV2 format.")
>
> “guix lint” probably complains about this description, because it is a
> sentence fragment, not a full sentence. It would also be nice if this
> would include a list of plugin classes that are among this collection.
> People who are looking for a chorus effect with “guix package -s
> chorus”, for example, would not find this package. It doesn’t have to
> be the complete list of plugins, but the categories that are covered
> should be mentioned (e.g. “filters” instead of “lowpass, butterworth,
> simple comb, ...”).
>
> > + (license license:gpl3+))))
>
> Could you please send an updated patch (after running your final version
> through “guix lint”)?
>
> Thanks!
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
>
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, (continued)
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, Florian Paul Schmidt, 2015/12/06
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/07
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, Mark H Weaver, 2015/12/07
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/08
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/09
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/09
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/09
- Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2,
Leo Famulari <=
Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP, v2], Florian Paul Schmidt, 2015/12/10