guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.60.0


From: Eric Bavier
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.60.0
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:49:07 -0600

On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:29:03 +0100
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

> Eric Bavier <address@hidden> skribis:
>  
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/boost-mips-avoid-m32.patch 
> > b/gnu/packages/patches/boost-mips-avoid-m32.patch
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 811c9fb..0000000
> > --- a/gnu/packages/patches/boost-mips-avoid-m32.patch
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
> > -The following patch prevents the use of the -m32 flag on mips, where it
> > -is not understood by gcc, as well as other non-x86 architectures.
> > -
> > -diff -u -r boost_1_58_0.orig/tools/build/src/tools/gcc.jam 
> > boost_1_58_0/tools/build/src/tools/gcc.jam
> > ---- boost_1_58_0.orig/tools/build/src/tools/gcc.jam        2015-04-04 
> > 19:25:07.000000000 +0200
> > -+++ boost_1_58_0/tools/build/src/tools/gcc.jam     2015-07-10 
> > 01:08:19.822733823 +0200
> > -@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@
> > -         else
> > -         {
> > -             local arch = [ feature.get-values architecture : 
> > $(properties) ] ;
> > --            if $(arch) != arm
> > -+            if $(arch) = x86
> 
> Do you know if this patch or something equivalent was applied upstream?
> 
> I guess we’ll have to wait for Hydra’s feedback on MIPS.

Something similar has been incorporated upstream, so I think we should
be OK on MIPS.

`~Eric



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]