Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add eSpeak

[Leo Famulari]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:48:18PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:58:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > So, in the future we should probably
> > package espeak-ng as well, for the sake of users that need speech
> > synthesis. It will conflict with espeak since the output binaries have
> > the same names.
> 
> From what you write, would it not be better to directly package espeak-ng
> and to drop espeak?

Eventually we should do that, but for now I think we should provide the
espeak that users are familiar with. I am not sure how much the
interface has changed in espeak-ng, if at all. I'm going to try it out
soon.

> 
> Andreas
>