Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm-llnl.

[Pjotr Prins]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:08:01AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > > I think we should rather use "slurm-wlm" if we are trying to
> > > dissambiguate with the "Slurm the Realtime network interface monitor".
> > The website https://computing.llnl.gov/linux/slurm/ suggests
> > otherwise. Also archlinux took this name
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slurm-llnl/
> 
> And Debian, but we are free to use our own conventions. Do you think it
> is likely that we will package the other slurm? Otherwise, I would simply
> go with "slurm" now according to our package guidelines; and then we can
> still name the other slurm as slurm-nlm or similar.

There is already a slurm package. But it does something different. I
propose we do it my way, so outsiders understand it. Let them flock
over from Debian ;)

Pj.