Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm.

[Andreas Enge]

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:13:37PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I used diffoscope to compare the non-working patch and a "should-be"
> identical patch that I generated locally. The only differences were in
> the patch headers and the encoding of the file (UTF-8 vs ISO-8859-1).

I think that explains it: The non-working part of the patch was the copyright
line, which contains the copyright symbol!

So let us all move to utf-8!

Andreas