[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
What would a Maven build system be like?
What would a Maven build system be like?
Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:14:14 +0100
Roel and I discussed this off-list already and we thought it would be a
good idea to bring this discussion to the list. (This email recycles
sentences both Roel and I wrote in our off-list discussion; mistakes are
In order to make packaging of Java software easier we should have a
maven-build-system. By default Maven downloads binary artifacts from a
remote Maven repository. The required binary artifacts are listed in
“pom.xml” files and identified by a combination of “groupId”,
“artifactId”, and “version”.
According to the documentation it is possible to force Maven to build
stuff offline with:
mvn -o package
They also mention “internal repositories” that can be accessed via
“file://” URLs and that can be managed locally by manually downloading
“Such an internal repository can be downloaded from using HTTP or
the file system (using a file:// URL), and uploaded to using SCP,
FTP, or a file copy.
To set up an internal repository just requires that you have a
place to put it, and then start copying required artifacts there
using the same layout as in a remote repository such as
We could probably generate such a fake repository as part of the
maven-build-system and populate it with only the jars that have been
specified as inputs.
A problem we now face is to recreate a local subset of the Maven
repository in a build phase using nothing but the package recipes and
static data encoded in our build system. I don’t know if there is a
generic way to do this or if we need to store additional properties like
“maven-artifact-id” and “maven-group-id”.
For example, there’s a library called “hamcrest-core”. Currently, I’m
building it with the upcoming “ant-build-system”, which installs a jar
archive to “$out/share/java/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar” — an ad-hoc location
because the location of jars really isn’t important as long as they are
on the classpath. “hamcrest-core-1.3.jar” is the name that is generated
at compile time; I only had a hand in setting the prefix as
Now, if I wanted to use a “maven-build-system” to build something that
depended on “hamcrest-core” it would not be enough for me to ensure that
the jar is on the classpath. Instead I would have to generate a
directory structure mimicking the central Maven repository and make the
jar available at the expected location.
For “hamcrest-core” this happens to be
(string-append repo-root "/"
(string-join (string-split maven-group-id #\.) "/") "/"
maven-artifact-id "-" version ".jar")
Here’s a path on a public Maven repository for “hamcrest-core”:
The first task of such a Maven build system would be to create a
temporary tree in which all of these jars are linked to the expected
location (instead of just hanging around at their own “$out/share/java/”
Since not every application uses Maven (or even the same version of
Maven), and I cannot yet be certain that the directory layout remains
the same across different versions of Maven, I think it would be best to
generate this dynamically rather than change the prefix for Java
libraries to “$out/maven-repo/” and then place the jars at the leaves of
(Still, the question remains where best to put jars in their own output
According to the “Apache Maven 3 cookbook” there are conventional build
steps for the Maven build system:
> mvn validate: validates that all project information is
> available and is correct
> mvn compile: compiles the source code
> mvn test: runs unit tests within a suitable framework
> mvn package: packages the compiled code in its distribution
> mvn integration-test: processes the package in the integration-test
> mvn verify: runs checks to verify that the package is valid
> mvn install: installs the package in the local repository
Since we must keep outputs separate, we cannot just install the jars
with “mvn install” into the fake ad-hoc Maven repository we generate
from store items at build time. We would need a final step to move the
installed jars from the local Maven repository to their final location
in the store.
So, to summarise:
* do we need to change the default target location of all jar archives
to accomodate the needs of Maven or can we generate a temporary local
Maven repository as part of the maven-build-system?
* is there an alternative to storing “maven-artifact-id” and
“maven-group-id” with Guix package expressions for Java libraries that
can be required by a package using the maven-build-system?
* is this a sane way to move forward?
Comments are very welcome!
- What would a Maven build system be like?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=