guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] Fix gfortran (?)


From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: [PATCH] Fix gfortran (?)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:16:20 +0100

Hi Guix,

with this patch applied I can build randomjungle without having to add
the “lib” output of gfortran to the package inputs.

This is related to the changes I pushed in commit 82f145e to fix
bug#19733, which seems to have broken the build of randomjungle and
slepc, among others.

Is this acceptable?  Should we do this for all gfortran variants then?

~~ Ricardo

>From f3d97b7f1f2b597f7f74b2f59212f241a87fa602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:09:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gfortran: Disable separate "lib" output.

* gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gfortran): Disable separate "lib" output.
---
 gnu/packages/gcc.scm | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
index 1df5150..341c30c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
@@ -474,7 +474,8 @@ as the 'native-search-paths' field."
 
 (define-public gfortran
   (custom-gcc gcc "gfortran" '("fortran")
-              %generic-search-paths))
+              %generic-search-paths
+              #:separate-lib-output? #f))
 
 (define-public gfortran-5
   (custom-gcc gcc-5 "gfortran" '("fortran")
-- 
2.1.0


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]