[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: python general question (setup.py)
From: |
Cyril Roelandt |
Subject: |
Re: python general question (setup.py) |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:31:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.0 |
On 03/25/2016 11:02 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> I have a question on python.
> My theory is that this is true:
> If I write a setup.py and contribute it to a project because I
> want to make an "easier"[1] install in Guix and elsewhere,
> I feed the "one packagemanager per language" thing.
>
Not really. You can use setup.py without pip. Think of setup.py as some
kind of Makefile for Python.
> Is setup.py the equivalent of a package manager in python or does
> it serve more purposes? I would like to know if I want to follow
> my current task in either fixing the setup.py I started for the
> upcoming bitmessage 0.6 release or if I want to write a Guix
> package without using out python-setup-tools which require
> setup.py to be present.
>
No, the equivalent of a package manager is "pip", which uses packages
from pypi.python.org.
If we are talking about
https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Compiling_instructions , I must say the
installation instructions are a bit weird for a Python project.
Cyril.