[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?

From: Alex Kost
Subject: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 13:33:10 +0300
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

I should have asked this when emacs-build-system was introduced.  Why
does it put emacs packages in sub-directories of
"/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"?  It looks more natural to me just to
use "/share/emacs/site-lisp".

I don't see any potential conflicts here: some packages will put their
elisp files right in the site-lisp dir (gnu-build-system does it by
default), and emacs-build-system can just use
"/share/emacs/site-lisp/<package>" sub-directories.

"guix.d" seems redundant to me.  What do people think?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]