[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: core-updates vs. core-updates-next
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: core-updates vs. core-updates-next |
Date: |
Sat, 28 May 2016 17:38:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:14:09AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> address@hidden (Leo Famulari) skribis:
>>
>> > commit b0bbf2491e346a355c1ec5584c16de7fbfa14f5e
>> > Author: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
>> > Date: Thu May 26 13:24:41 2016 -0400
>> >
>> > gnu: expat: Remove replacement.
>> >
>> > * gnu/packages/xml.scm (expat)[replacement]: Remove field.
>> > (expat/fixed): Remove variable.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > commit aee7f2e98ae2cbbd0cd765beda6c0a4279929c94
>> > Author: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
>> > Date: Thu May 26 22:45:51 2016 -0400
>> >
>> > gnu: libxslt: Update to 1.1.29.
>> >
>> > * gnu/packages/patches/libxslt-CVE-2015-7995.patch: Delete file.
>> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it.
>> > * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxslt): Update to 1.1.29.
>> > [source]: Remove patch.
>>
>> Clarification: until Hydra has started building all of core-updates,
>> it’s OK to push non-core updates like these to core-updates.
>>
>> There are still a couple of issues at
>> <https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates> to be fixed in the core
>> packages before we can ask Hydra to build all of core-updates. Until
>> then, feel free! :-)
>
> Okay, do you think I should move the commits from core-updates-next to
> core-updates?
Yes, please! Just cherry-picking them and that should be fine.
Thank you,
Ludo’.