Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

[宋文武]

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> [...]
>
> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at
> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the
> manpage timestamps.
Cool!

>
> These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but
> also of libreoffice (libreoffice seems to depend on *everything*) and a
> few others. If the patches are good, should they go to master or to
> another branch?
>
I prefer master, and I guess people who use libreoffice don't update it
frequently (we have a old version, but no one complain so far).