[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

From: 宋文武
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 21:07:32 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> [...]
> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at
> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the
> manpage timestamps.

> These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but
> also of libreoffice (libreoffice seems to depend on *everything*) and a
> few others. If the patches are good, should they go to master or to
> another branch?
I prefer master, and I guess people who use libreoffice don't update it
frequently (we have a old version, but no one complain so far).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]