[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jul 2016 22:25:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:54:02PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> address@hidden (宋文武) skribis:
>
> > Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at
> >> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the
> >> manpage timestamps.
> > Cool!
> >
> >>
> >> These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but
> >> also of libreoffice (libreoffice seems to depend on *everything*) and a
> >> few others. If the patches are good, should they go to master or to
> >> another branch?
> >>
> > I prefer master, and I guess people who use libreoffice don't update it
> > frequently (we have a old version, but no one complain so far).
>
> (Oops, I replied before seeing your message.) I have a slight
> preference for ‘core-updates’, which I hope can be merged within a few
> days. Sounds good?
I incorporated the reviewers' comments and applied to core-updates,
bringing it to 98529948.
Thank you!
- [PATCH 3/5] gnu: Add python-snowballstemmer., (continued)
- [PATCH 3/5] gnu: Add python-snowballstemmer., Leo Famulari, 2016/07/01
- [PATCH 1/5] gnu: Add python-imagesize., Leo Famulari, 2016/07/01
- [PATCH 4/5] gnu: python-sphinx: Update to 1.4.4., Leo Famulari, 2016/07/01
- [PATCH 5/5] gnu: python-sphinx-rtd-theme: Update to 0.1.9., Leo Famulari, 2016/07/01
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update, 宋文武, 2016/07/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/03