[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: none
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: none |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:51:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Pjotr,
Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> skribis:
> From 5fd8f64794b27f59f6688177a7a9e532b5d57f01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:13:27 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add elixir.
> To: address@hidden
> From: Pjotr Prins <address@hidden>
> References: <address@hidden>
>
> * gnu/packages/elixir.scm: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
Thanks for the great work!
In
<https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/ELIXIR.org#the-gnu-guix-dance-of-getting-packages-accepted>,
you already identified exactly what we were going to say. :-)
Namely, why are patches applied in a build phase rather than in
‘origin’, why is such and such test disabled (one sentence is usually
enough), what happens if we set ‘HOME’ like Ben suggests, etc.
What should we do? :-)
Ludo’.
Re: none,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: none, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/21
- Re: none, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/21
- Re: none, Jookia, 2016/07/21
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/21
- Re: none, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Jookia, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Jookia, 2016/07/24