[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gs

From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: Re: Gs
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 01:01:41 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1

Andreas Enge <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
> the following commit
> commit eb354bdacbf4154ec66038dac07f19bf4ced1fad
> Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
> Date:   Mon May 9 15:54:34 2016 +0200
>     gnu: ghostscript: Do not build the statically-linked 'gs' binary.
>     * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghostscript)[arguments]: Remove
>     'build-so' and 'install-so' phases.  Replace 'build' and 'install'
>     phases.
> removes "gs" from the ghostscript package. However, this is the usual program
> that people expect. For instance, unison uses it for building its
> documentation. Is there a dynamically linked binary which replaces gs?
> If yes, should we add a symbolic link?

This also broke our “lilypond” package on core-updates.

~~ Ricardo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]