[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:20:28 +0000 |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> I would not be at all suprised if there were more incompatibilities like
> this. Ought we not have a lint rule that checks this?
>
> J'
>
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:35:54AM +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
> Hi guixes,
>
> First, congratulations to Ricardo Wurmus as new maintainer and the new
> 0.11 release is good (it passed all tests)!
>
> I notice 'octave 4.0.2' has 'address@hidden' as one of its inputs. As
> far as I know, gplv3 is incompatible with openssl license
> (https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html).
>
> How should we fix this?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> --
> Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email.
> PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
> fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
> See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
>
Isn't this an upstream problem? I don't know octave but is openssl
required? Can it be replaced by something different?
Does this require upstream action/reporting?
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
- octave license is incompatible with openssl, Alex Vong, 2016/08/04
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, John Darrington, 2016/08/04
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/05
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, Alex Vong, 2016/08/05
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/08
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, Alex Vong, 2016/08/09
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, Mike Miller, 2016/08/09
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/09
- Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl, kei, 2016/08/09